Pavel M.Myachin, Alexander A.Shpilman

Russian

Influence of the "Axion Field " on Hardness Pearlitic of Pig-iron

In 1993 were carried out the tests of microhardness of samples of alloys of iron on the device PMT-3 (see "Outcomes of experiment on study of influence of effect of Axion radiation on hardness of metal"). The tests were carried out for revealing possible effects of action of the "axion fields" on various material objects. In result the changes of microhardness as in the party of increase and downturn were fixed.

In 2000 a series of experiments on pearlitic pig-iron was carried out (C-3.5%, Si-0.8%, Mn-1%, S-0.15%, Cr-1%, P-0.15%).

In laboratory KSS Zhezkazgan of a foundry-mechanical factory the tests of superficial hardness on a Brinel method are made. The tests were carried out at loading 3000 kilogram-force by a ball D=5 mm. For an irradiation the generators of 3 models - generator "COMFORT - M" (K), generator with optical excitation (O), generator such as N2/96 (C) were used.

the generator

 

average value

metering error

%
change

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1

 

444

477

477

477

444

444

477

444

477

444

460,5

5,5

 
 

K

534

534

534

514

514

496

496

496

514

496

512,8

5,3

11,4

2

 

477

444

477

477

477

444

477

477

477

477

470,4

4,4

 
 

C

534

461

461

496

461

461

496

477

477

477

480,1

7,4

9,1

3

 

461

444

444

415

461

429

321

321

375

363

403,4

17,2

 
 

O

429

444

477

461

429

461

429

444

415

461

445,0

6,2

10,3

 

Irradiation by different models of generators have shown identical increase of hardness of pearlitic pig-iron within the limits of an error of measurement. Proceeding from this, it is possible to make a conclusion, that under action of an "axion field" in pig-iron there is earlier unknown convertible phase transition, which gives fixed stair of change of hardness.

In laboratory of material structure of Chemical-metallurgical institute AN RK, the measurements of hardness on separate phases of pig-iron (pearlitic, cementite and conglomerate) on the device PMT-3 were carried out, at loading 50 gram and increase microscope 487*. As the pressed tool (indicator) applied a diamond pyramid with the square basis and corner at top between opposite sides of 136 degrees.

The irradiation was made by the generator "The Generator of the "Axion Field " Sort 5".

The results of measurements are given in the table.

Phase component

 

average value.

metering error.

metering error
%

%
change

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

1

Pearlitic a phase, up to an irradiation

387

418

402

402

402

387

473

436

436

                   

416,0

9,4

2,3

 

2

Pearlitic a phase, after an irradiation

550

436

436

402

455

387

504

527

550

402

387

504

418

387

636

527

527

579

473

478,2

16,9

3,5

15,0

3

ementite conglomeration, up to an irradiation

1450

1267

1626

1626

1830

1267

1758

1267

1626

                   

1524,1

73,0

4,8

 

4

ementite conglomeration, after an irradiation

1380

1450

1389

1830

1830

1758

2096

2370

1758

1830

1626

1626

2370

2096

1758

1626

1758

1758

 

1794,8

67,5

3,8

17,8

5

ementite lamellate, up to an irradiation

1267

1758

2096

1758

1758

1758

1758

1626

1626

                   

1711,6

71,7

4,2

 

6

ementite lamellate, after an irradiation

2096

1101

1758

1758

1626

1450

2096

1267

2096

2575

1830

2096

1035

1626

1176

1267

1830

1389

 

1670,5

99,6

6,0

-2,4

 

From the table it is visible, that pearlitic and cementite conglomeration of a phase are most subject to influence. It is possible to explain it by the maximal activity of carbon in these phases.

 

Thematic Contents

CONTENTS

Hosted by uCoz